|
MRPL reviews execution mode
Pragnya Pandey
Phase-III Refinery Project
After delays and cost escalations in phase-III of its refinery project,
Mangalore Refinery & Petrochemicals Ltd, a subsidiary of ONGC Ltd, is now at the
crossroads regarding the project execution methodology for the project. The
project aims to augment its refining capacity from 9.6 million tpa to 15 million
tpa.
Officials are discussing the best possible methodology for various units of the
project that are on the critical path. For instance, sources claim that in case
the petro-fluidised catalytic cracking (PFCC) unit of the project is awarded on
LSTK basis, the mechanical completion may not be achieved by October 2011, as
approved by the company board earlier, and could extend up to January-February
2012.
"While phase-III was to have achieved mechanical completion by June 2010 and the
original estimate was Rs 7,943 crore, we have been beleaguered by an overheated
market hampering the appointment of process licensors, delay in land
acquisition, and steep increase in steel and cement prices in the last 12-18
months," U.K. Basu, Managing Director, MRPL, was quoted as saying on the
company's website. The project estimate has been revised to Rs 12,412 crore.
The second unit on the critical list is the sulphur recovery unit (SRU). The
process design licensor for this unit is yet to be finalised in the absence of
design basis data, which is now being developed based on inputs from various
other process licensors.
Senior MRPL officials confirmed to Projectmonitor that it had recently received
approval for the final project execution methodology of the phase-III project.
The company board has cleared the selection of Engineers India Ltd as the
project management consultant for executing the PFCC and SRU units on OBE-LSTK
methodology, followed by Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd for its DHDT/ISOM
units. EIL will be awarded the contract on nomination basis on terms and
conditions to be negotiated and finalised by a high-powered board committee,
since the tendering process failed.
Only two bidders - Larsen & Toubro Ltd and Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd -
responded to MRPL's global tender for the project. Although L&T qualified, it
has indicated that it would not submit bids, leaving only Bhel in the fray.
Among the other components of the project, the DHDT unit will be executed
through LSTK; CDU/VDU through EPCM consultants, LSTK tender to be cancelled; HGU
through LSTK; CPP through Bhel on nomination basis; DCU through four LSTK
contracts with certain free issue materials; HCU revamp, utilities and off-site
through EPCM; and CHT unit via LSTK.
[February 16-22, 2009]
|