|
52 cities submit development plans
M.C. Vaijayanthi
One year of JNNURM
The ministry of urban development and the ministry of housing
and urban poverty alleviation inserted an advertisement on November 14,
Jawaharlal Nehru's birthday, to remind citizens that the urban renewal mission
launched in his name is close to celebrating its first anniversary.
JNNURM, a first or its kind initiative to rebuild our cities and reform the way
the urban local bodies function, had covered a lot of distance from the time it
was launched. "Overall it is progressing reasonably well," comments Usha
Raghupathi, associate professor at the National Institute of Urban Affairs, New
Delhi.
From the 63 cities chosen to be the mission cities, 52 have submitted their City
Development Plans, 41 have been appraised and the rest are under appraisal.
Despite initial hiccups in understanding the concept of CDP, appointment of
consultants, cities rushed forward to finalise the document as funds are to be
approved on a first-cum-first- serve basis. "There was no such document before.
Different departments were looking after different utilities and it is for the
first time a single comprehensive report has been prepared. The very fact that
they have put together a document is commendable," says Raghupathi.
Understanding the need for reforms and committing to it is a much difficult task
compared to CDPs. "First, making cities work is critical. Second, it is clear
that the mission is about producing governance in cities. Money that is granted
is a reward for committing to reforms," emphasises Sheela Patel, member of the
technical advisory group, JNNURM.
Many states have set the reform process in motion and 23 cities from nine states
and a Union territory have signed MoAs with the ministry, agreeing to implement
the mandatory reforms. Time line for implementing reforms like repeal of the
Urban Land Ceiling Act, and changing the accounting system to double entry book
keeping have been set out in the MoAs. "Though projects have been approved and
grants committed, they would be disbursed subject to implementation of the
reforms and also on the project progress," assures Patel.
So far 278 detailed project reports have been submitted, 118 appraised and 84
approved by the sanctioning authority. Andhra Pradesh leads the list of total
number of projects sanctioned with 22 projects and Maharashtra in cost of
projects at Rs 1,454.14 crore. Out of total project cost for Maharashtra, Rs 783
crore will be the GoI grant commitment, Rs 235 crore committed by the state and
Rs 434 crore committed by urban local bodies. So far the ministry of finance has
released Rs 474 crore for 88 projects sanctioned from 9 states. Most of the
projects for which approvals have been granted relate to water supply and sewage
system.
Almost all the project details and approvals are listed out in detail and put up
on the JNNURM website by the ministry. "Our idea is to put all the details on
the public domain so that anyone can get information without resorting to RTI,"
says Patel. Citizen groups have also become active in the consultative process
and in fact there is an internet e-mail group started to deliberate JNNURM
projects in Delhi by the Centre for Civil Society.
"There are both positive and negative comments on JNNURM. Those who are negative
feel it is not pro-poor and the reforms mandated could result in evictions. They
also look at it as an agenda of ADB and other multilateral agencies. The
positive side looks at the long term impact of reforms," says Makarand Bakore
who moderates JNNURM Delhi yahoo group.
Though Rs 50,000 crore for the project looks like a big sum, the criticism has
been that it is small if it is spread over 63 cities for seven years. Whether
the scheme will see any changes when it steps into its second year is too early
to say, feels Raghupathi. It is only in the second or third year, after
monitoring the progress, can the needs for change be assessed. On the fund part
she says, "It is not sufficient, our demands are great. But what JNNURM sets out
to do is to create conditions for the private sector to invest."
[20 November 2006]
|